Search Results For -proportionality

1
EEOC v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., No. 15-cv-256 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2018)
2
Ramos v. Hopele of Fort Lauderdale, LLC., No. 0:17-cv-62100-FAM (S.D. Fla. March 19, 2018)
3
The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, Et Al. (Middle District of Louisana, 2018)
4
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Techs., LLC, et al., No. 4:17-CV-00450 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2018)
5
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. ePRO E-Commerce Ltd., No. 16-3637-cv (L) (2nd Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)
6
In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)
7
Hurd v. City of Lincoln, No. 4:16-CV-3029 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2017)
8
Gottesman v. Santana, No. 16-cv-2902 JLS (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2017)
9
Court Compels Search of Additional Custodians, Notes Defendant’s Failure to Provide “Even a Rough Estimate” of the Alleged Burden
10
City of Seattle v. ZyLAB North America, LLC (Western District of Washington, Seattle, 2017)

EEOC v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., No. 15-cv-256 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant claimed reviewing 363,000 emails would be unduly burdensome. Court rules that even the expected responsiveness rate of between 8.3% and 15% meant it would be valuable. Court required defendant to review the emails and denied cost shifting requested by defendant.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Email

Keywords: burdensome, responsiveness, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Ramos v. Hopele of Fort Lauderdale, LLC., No. 0:17-cv-62100-FAM (S.D. Fla. March 19, 2018)

Key Insight: Forensic examination must be proportional to the information it can exclusively gain, including privacy concerns

Nature of Case: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (Class Action)

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: Text messages, imaging, forensic, proportionality

View Case Opinion

The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, Et Al. (Middle District of Louisana, 2018)

Key Insight: Discovery costs must be proportional to the amount in controversy ($20 million in dispute allows for at least $13,000 in discovery costs)

Nature of Case: Contract breach

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents/communications

Keywords: Backup tapes, proportionality, catastrophic failure

View Case Opinion

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Techs., LLC, et al., No. 4:17-CV-00450 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2018)

Key Insight: Broad requests by Plaintiff were narrowed by conference and court decision to time period during and after Defendant’s employment

Nature of Case: Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Confidential Information

Electronic Data Involved: E-mails and Documents

Keywords: proportionality, relevancy, time-limited

View Case Opinion

Klipsch Group, Inc. v. ePRO E-Commerce Ltd., No. 16-3637-cv (L) (2nd Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)

Key Insight: Intentional spoliation/persistent discovery misconduct can lead to sanctions well above the amount in dispute

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (trademark infringement/counterfeit)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: Sanctions, proportionality, willfully, adverse inference

View Case Opinion

In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance and proportionality

Nature of Case: false advertising

Electronic Data Involved: documents, communications

Keywords: relevant, proportional, reconsideration, additional discovery, custodial files, protective order, third party discovery

View Case Opinion

Hurd v. City of Lincoln, No. 4:16-CV-3029 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2017)

Key Insight: No produced emails were from the Mayor. Mayor’s deposition not necessary or proportional to needs of the case.

Nature of Case: employment discrimination and retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: Over 6,500 emails and attachments produced by defendant.

Keywords: Relevant and proportional, proportionality, mere conjecture and conclusory statements.

View Case Opinion

Gottesman v. Santana, No. 16-cv-2902 JLS (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2017)

Key Insight: statute of limitations, proportionality

Nature of Case: copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: financial information

Keywords: meeting of the minds, statute of limitations, undue burden, amount in controversy

View Case Opinion

Court Compels Search of Additional Custodians, Notes Defendant’s Failure to Provide “Even a Rough Estimate” of the Alleged Burden

Mann v. City of Chicago, Nos. 15 CV 9197, 13 CV 4531, 2017 WL 3970592 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 8, 2017)

Plaintiffs sued the City of Chicago and the Chicago police alleging that they had been wrongfully arrested, detained and prosecuted and that they were abused at “off the books” detention centers without access to counsel. Although the parties agreed on search terms and the majority of custodians, they “reached an impasse” as to which custodians in the Mayor’s Office should be searched, including the Mayor himself.  Because the court found the information sought would be relevant and because Defendant did not establish the alleged burden of the request—failing to provide even an estimate—the court granted in part Plaintiffs’ motion to compel, including their request to add the Mayor.  In so deciding, the court also noted several proportionality factors, including the importance of the issues at stake and the plaintiffs’ lack of access to the requested information.

Read More

City of Seattle v. ZyLAB North America, LLC (Western District of Washington, Seattle, 2017)

Key Insight: Method of production requiring out-of state travel not contract breach and retention of counsel not enough to show material is privileged

Nature of Case: breach of contract, consumer protection act litigation

Electronic Data Involved: audit documents

Keywords: proportionality, foreign parent, method of production, privilege determination

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.