Tag:Text Message

1
Ehrenberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 16-17269 (E.D. La. Aug. 18, 2017).
2
T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)
3
Montgomery v. Iron Rooster, No. RDB-16-3760 (D. Md. May 9, 2017)
4
Engurasoff v. Coca-Cola Refreshments (Northern District of California, 2017)
5
Scott v. Eglin Fed. Credit Union (N.D. Fla., 2017)
6
Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)
7
Kellgren v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. (S.D. Cal., 2017)
8
Healthwerks, Inc. et al. v. Stryker Spine, et al., No. 14-93 (E.D. Wisc. Mar. 6, 2017)
9
Citibank v. Super Sayin Publishing (Southern District of NY, 2017)
10
Redzepagic v. Hammer – Case Opinion (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Ehrenberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 16-17269 (E.D. La. Aug. 18, 2017).

Key Insight: Data link

Nature of Case: Insurance claim, Personal injury action

Electronic Data Involved: Documents, social media records including Facebook/ Twitter?Instagram ” data link”. photos

Keywords: Personal injury, Insurance claim, “data link”.

View Case Opinion

T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Keyword searching alone may not be sufficient and can be aided by strategies like predictive coding

Nature of Case: civil rights, fourth amendment

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, social media posts

Keywords: keyword searching, predictive coding

View Case Opinion

Montgomery v. Iron Rooster, No. RDB-16-3760 (D. Md. May 9, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions for spoliation of evidence resulting from good faith destruction of cell phone

Nature of Case: labor violations

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: spoliation, smartphone, intent to deprive

View Case Opinion

Engurasoff v. Coca-Cola Refreshments (Northern District of California, 2017)

Key Insight: Disclosing legal advice to third parties that need to know via email maintains attorney client privilege

Nature of Case: class action

Electronic Data Involved: archived email

Keywords: timeliness, third parties need to know, attorney client privilege

Identified State Rule(s): Ca. Evidence Code 952

View Case Opinion

Scott v. Eglin Fed. Credit Union (N.D. Fla., 2017)

Key Insight: Discovery of these things was blocked, since they were ruled to be only marginally relevant compared to the time and expense it would take to produce them.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: emails and text messages

Keywords: relevance, marginal relevance, time and expense

View Case Opinion

Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)

Key Insight: Can the court order additional discovery if a party destroys evidence? Is a prejudice ruling required in a destruction of evidence case?

Nature of Case: Retaliation and discharge

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, emails, social media messages

Keywords: Prejudice, Destruction of evidence, Social media, Text messages

View Case Opinion

Kellgren v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. (S.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: Discovery request for managers’ text messages was ruled overbroad and not likely to be useful due to store policy that managers only communicate via email or voicemail.

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act dispute

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, email, communication methods the managers could have possibly used

Keywords: Text messages, overbreadth, overbroad, relevance

View Case Opinion

Healthwerks, Inc. et al. v. Stryker Spine, et al., No. 14-93 (E.D. Wisc. Mar. 6, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiffs files motion to compel text messages in April 2016, Discovery had closed in November 2015. Defendant’s failure to realize that they couldn’t search specifically for text messages is not basis for granting motion to compel so late. Decision was later vacated.

Nature of Case: Contract Dispute

Electronic Data Involved: Text Messages

Keywords: Text messages; after discovery closed

View Case Opinion

Citibank v. Super Sayin Publishing (Southern District of NY, 2017)

Key Insight: Updated spoliation rule was correctly applied to motion regarding earlier conduct because the party cited the updated rule

Nature of Case: Negotiable instrument

Electronic Data Involved: deleted electronic records, emails, text messages

Keywords: retroactive application discovery rule, ESI spoliation sanctions

Identified Local Court Rule(s): S. District N Local Civil Rule 7.1(a)(1)

View Case Opinion

Redzepagic v. Hammer – Case Opinion (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions denied against defendant because text messages were available from a different source, sanctions denied against plaintiff because documents were not under plaintiff’s control

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act (failure to pay overtime wages)

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: FLSA, Sefket, CBA,

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.