Archive - February 27, 2017

1
Redzepagic v. Hammer – Case Opinion (Southern District of New York, 2017)
2
Below v. Yokohoma Tire Corp (Western District of Wisconsin, 2017)
3
Air Products v. Wiesemann (D. Del., 2017)

Redzepagic v. Hammer – Case Opinion (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions denied against defendant because text messages were available from a different source, sanctions denied against plaintiff because documents were not under plaintiff’s control

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act (failure to pay overtime wages)

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: FLSA, Sefket, CBA,

View Case Opinion

Below v. Yokohoma Tire Corp (Western District of Wisconsin, 2017)

Key Insight: Negligence or even gross negligence is not necessarily bad faith and thus not spoliation

Nature of Case: Product liability

Electronic Data Involved: Car electronic data

Keywords: truck, bad faith, salvage yard, spoliation, sword, shield

View Case Opinion

Air Products v. Wiesemann (D. Del., 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions not allowed on parties wiping laptops, because they had only been named as search terms after the other party knew that wiping had happened. No sanction for lost emails available from another source. Pure speculation is not enough to find that relevant ESI was destroyed.

Nature of Case: Securities and Commodities litigation

Electronic Data Involved: Computer log info, laptop info

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, inherent authority

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.