Tag:Proportionality

1
Space Data Corp. v. Google LLC, and others – 16-cv-03260 (Northern District of CA , 2018)
2
Washington v. Wal-Mart (5:16-cv-01403-EEF-MLH) (W.D. La., 2018)
3
Delago v. Tarabochia (No. C17-1822RSL (W.D. Wash. May 4, 2018), 2018)
4
Mitchell v. Capitol Records, LLC, No. 3:15-CV-00174-JHM (W.D. Ky. Apr. 30, 2018).
5
In re Morning Song Bird Food Litigation (S.D. Ind., 2018)
6
Cen Com, Inc. v. Numerex Corp. (W.D. Wash., 2018)
7
TMJ Grp., LLC v. IMCMV Holdings, No. 17-4677 (E.D. La. April 6, 2018)
8
Ortolani v. Freedom Mortgage Corp., No. 17-cv-1462-JGB (KKK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2018)
9
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Systems, Inc. v. Multiplan, Inc., No. 12-cv-1633 (JMA) (AKT) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2018).
10
EEOC v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., No. 15-cv-256 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2018)

Space Data Corp. v. Google LLC, and others – 16-cv-03260 (Northern District of CA , 2018)

Key Insight: whether specific discovery could be compelled to complete a deposition with no real argument of relevancy

Nature of Case: trade secret infringement

Electronic Data Involved: board minutes discussing third-party litigation funding

Keywords: Third-party litigation funding, board minutes, deposition

View Case Opinion

Washington v. Wal-Mart (5:16-cv-01403-EEF-MLH) (W.D. La., 2018)

Key Insight: Retention policy; Summary Judgment; Adverse inference; Spoliation

Nature of Case: Slip and Fall

Electronic Data Involved: ESI; Security video; Correspondence

Keywords: Retention policy; Summary Judgment; Adverse inference; Spoliation; Bad Faith

View Case Opinion

Delago v. Tarabochia (No. C17-1822RSL (W.D. Wash. May 4, 2018), 2018)

Key Insight: whether certain ESI production requests relating to ESI created both before and after a personal injury incident are proportional to the needs of the case

Nature of Case: personal injury, Jones Act

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, call logs, roaming data logs, phone account information, credit card transaction history, bank account transaction history

Keywords: “defendants are fishing”, ” balance of the benefits and burdens of these post-incident discovery requests are not in defendants’ favor”, “wheelhouse”

View Case Opinion

Mitchell v. Capitol Records, LLC, No. 3:15-CV-00174-JHM (W.D. Ky. Apr. 30, 2018).

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections did not allow court to determine and defendants ordered to produce all documents withheld on basis of boilerplate objections.

Nature of Case: Copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Financial Records, Responses to Questions

Keywords: boilerplate objections

View Case Opinion

In re Morning Song Bird Food Litigation (S.D. Ind., 2018)

Key Insight: Non-party status is significant factor in proportionality analysis, must demonstrate ‘significant expense’ before receiving protection

Nature of Case: Racketeering, Consumer Protection

Electronic Data Involved: Deposition

Keywords: Deposition, transfer, removal, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Cen Com, Inc. v. Numerex Corp. (W.D. Wash., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance of search terms, proportionality

Nature of Case: breach of contract, trade secrets

Keywords: sanctions, motion to compel, search terms, third-party subpoenas, personal capacity, proportionality, attorney’s fees, current version, pending motion for protective order

View Case Opinion

TMJ Grp., LLC v. IMCMV Holdings, No. 17-4677 (E.D. La. April 6, 2018)

Key Insight: Documents produced on eve of deposition allowed for second deposition; text messages of employees not unduly burdensome; Financials in PDF form were OK assuming they were native format

Nature of Case: Fraudulent Inducement

Electronic Data Involved: Excel Spreadsheets/PDF; Text Messages

Keywords: incomplete production; native production; Proportionality

View Case Opinion

Ortolani v. Freedom Mortgage Corp., No. 17-cv-1462-JGB (KKK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2018)

Key Insight: proportionality, privacy

Nature of Case: labor dispute, class action

Electronic Data Involved: payroll records, electronic documents

Keywords: class action certification, relevance, overbroad

View Case Opinion

North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Systems, Inc. v. Multiplan, Inc., No. 12-cv-1633 (JMA) (AKT) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2018).

Key Insight: requiring creation of new documents, proportionality

Nature of Case: breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: electronic records

Keywords: timeliness, relevance, raw data, create, creation of documents, cost-shifting, preclusion order

Identified Local Court Rule(s): Loc. Civ. R. 37.1

View Case Opinion

EEOC v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., No. 15-cv-256 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant claimed reviewing 363,000 emails would be unduly burdensome. Court rules that even the expected responsiveness rate of between 8.3% and 15% meant it would be valuable. Court required defendant to review the emails and denied cost shifting requested by defendant.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Email

Keywords: burdensome, responsiveness, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.