Tag:Policy on Routine Records Management and Retention

1
Moody v. CSX Transportation (W.D.N.Y. , 2017)
2
Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC, No. 17-cv-00808-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Sept. 20, 2017)
3
Barry v. Big M Transportation, No. 1:16-cv-00167-JEO, 2017 WL 3980549 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 11, 2017)
4
Hefter Impact Techs, LLC v. Sport Maska, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-13290-PBS (D. Mass. Aug. 3, 2017)
5
Storey v. Effingham County, No. 4:2015cv00149, 2017 WL 2623775 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2017)
6
Henkle v. Cumberland Farms (S.D. Fla. , 2017)
7
Hugler v. Jasper Contractors, 1:16-cv-3845-LMM-JSA (ND Ga, 2017)
8
In Re State Farm Lloyds, Relator, Nos. 15-0903, 15-0905 (Tex. Sup. Ct. May 26, 2017)
9
Taylor v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., d/b/a Rite-Aid, No. 16-00474 (D. Or. May 12, 2017)
10
US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Moody v. CSX Transportation (W.D.N.Y. , 2017)

Key Insight: failure to take reasonable steps to preserve data, prejudice to other party, intent to deprive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: event recorder data: .dat file

Keywords: reasonable steps, adverse inference, relevance of data, event recorder, black box, laptop crash, prejudice, inferred intent to deprive

View Case Opinion

Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC, No. 17-cv-00808-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Sept. 20, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff had kept a journal which was scanned and provided. Original Hard Copy was then destroyed. Judge granted motion for additional deposition time, but denied adverse inference instruction.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination; Wrongful Termination

Electronic Data Involved: Hard Copy of Scanned Journal

Keywords: Sanctions, Adverse Inference, Scanned Copy, Hard Copy

View Case Opinion

Barry v. Big M Transportation, No. 1:16-cv-00167-JEO, 2017 WL 3980549 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 11, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant’s failure to preserve the relevant ESI.

Nature of Case: Motor vehicle accident

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic Data/Electronic Control Module (ECM) Vehicle Data Recorder/Black Box and associated data.

Keywords: Spoliation, ECM data

View Case Opinion

Hefter Impact Techs, LLC v. Sport Maska, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-13290-PBS (D. Mass. Aug. 3, 2017)

Key Insight: Whether deleted ESI and destroyed notebooks were relevant and, if so, whether there is sufficient evidence to find that spoliation was intentional or resulted in prejudice; whether sanction of reasonable costs is appropriate

Nature of Case: contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: deleted e-mail, deleted electronic records, hard-copy notebooks

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, notebook, litigation hold, bad faith, prejudice, deleted, legal hold, negligence, retention policy, backups

View Case Opinion

Storey v. Effingham County, No. 4:2015cv00149, 2017 WL 2623775 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation of video evidence. Evidence must have existed and been in the control of a party.

Nature of Case: civil rights action

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance and taser video

Keywords: spoliation sanctions, multi-step analysis, Rule 37(e), routine retention policy.

View Case Opinion

Henkle v. Cumberland Farms (S.D. Fla. , 2017)

Key Insight: whether sanction inappropriate absent bad faith

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: video footage

Keywords: surveillance footage, adverse inference, preservation letter, spoliation, Eleventh Circuit, prejudice, significant impairment, other available evidence

View Case Opinion

Hugler v. Jasper Contractors, 1:16-cv-3845-LMM-JSA (ND Ga, 2017)

Key Insight: petitioner’s motion for contempt, subpoena enforcement

Nature of Case: subpoena duces tecum issued by US Dept. of Labor to Respondent, a roofing company. Workplace safety violations and follow-up inspections..

Electronic Data Involved: text and email messages

Keywords: subpoena duces tecum, failure to take reasonable steps to comply with the order

View Case Opinion

Taylor v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., d/b/a Rite-Aid, No. 16-00474 (D. Or. May 12, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant had reviewed video recording twice and did not show area of spill and fall. Deleted recording per their normal 37 day video retention policy. Defendant moved for summary judgment, Plaintiff argued should be sanctioned by not granting order. Judge granted summary judgment.

Nature of Case: Personal Injury

Electronic Data Involved: Video Recording

Keywords: Summary Judgment; Retention Policy

View Case Opinion

US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: Whether FRCP 37(e) applies where the duty to preserve does not arise out of the anticipation or conduct of litigation, whether sanctions issued under a court’s inherent power were appropriate

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: country of origin data

Keywords: Country of Origin documentation, adverse inference, Trade Agreements Act, inherent power, overwrite, direct proof or disproof

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.