Tag: Computer Assisted Review

1
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-0465-MMS (Fed. Cl. Oct. 3, 2016)
2
Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00698-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018)
3
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pac. R.R., No. 1:11-cv-01049-PLF-GMH (D.D.C. Sept. 11, 2017)
4
Rabin v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (N.D. Cal., 2017)
5
Duffy v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (D. Kansas , 2017)
6
FCA US, LLC v. Cummins, Inc., No. 16-12883 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2017)
7
Davine v. Golub Corp. (Massachusetts District, 2017)
8
In re Viagra Products Liability Litigation (N.D. Cal., 2016)
9
Portland Pipe Line Corp. et al. v. City of South Portland et al. (D. Maine, 2016)
10
Dynamo Holdings L.P. v. Commissioner, No. 2685-11, 8393-12 (Tax Ct. July 13, 2016).

Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-0465-MMS (Fed. Cl. Oct. 3, 2016)

Key Insight: 1500 documents withheld as privileged under procedures in FRE 502 (d);

Nature of Case: Fifth Amendment, taking private property without just compensation

Electronic Data Involved: 1500 documents

Keywords: quick peek, privileged, taking, unjust compensation

View Case Opinion

Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00698-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018)

Key Insight: demand for irrelevant and disproportionate evidence

Nature of Case: breach of patent agreement

Electronic Data Involved: 300 GB emails

Keywords: irrelevant, patent infringement, reasonable limits on discovery

View Case Opinion

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pac. R.R., No. 1:11-cv-01049-PLF-GMH (D.D.C. Sept. 11, 2017)

Key Insight: ability to afford production, parties access to the relevant documents, impact on third parties

Nature of Case: Antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: 467,614 documents from electronic and physical files, 130 GB additional documents

Keywords: scope of discovery, antitrust, Sherman, cost/benefit

View Case Opinion

Rabin v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (N.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: The court allowed a party to use a rolling basis ESI, and ruled that with the assistance of TAR, a few thousand documents could be reviewed in the next few weeks.

Nature of Case: Workplace discrimination (age)

Electronic Data Involved: Business documents/files

Keywords: Predictive coding, TAR, Technology assisted review,

View Case Opinion

Davine v. Golub Corp. (Massachusetts District, 2017)

Key Insight: Predictive coding models are legitimate, and document review can stop when the burden outweighs the benefits.

Nature of Case: wage and hour class action

Electronic Data Involved: archived email

Keywords: privilege log, predictive coding,

View Case Opinion

Portland Pipe Line Corp. et al. v. City of South Portland et al. (D. Maine, 2016)

Key Insight: Two step process of TAR and manual review of privilege negated need for in camera review

Nature of Case: declaratory relief re environmental ordinance

Electronic Data Involved: emails

Keywords: in camera review

View Case Opinion

Dynamo Holdings L.P. v. Commissioner, No. 2685-11, 8393-12 (Tax Ct. July 13, 2016).

Key Insight: Predictive coding may be used to conserve time and expense where e-discovery expertise applied

Nature of Case: Embezzlement/Fraudulent Transfers Action

Electronic Data Involved: Backup storage tapes of exchange server containing tax-related information

Keywords: “computer-assisted review [tools]” “privileged or confidential information” “universe of documents”

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.