Tag:Computer Assisted Review

1
City of Rockford, et al. v. Mallinckrodt ARD Inc., et al. (Northern District of Illinois, 2018)
2
U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., No. 11-CV-3406 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 8, 2018)
3
Winfield v. City of New York, No. 1:15-cv-05236-LTS-KHP (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2017)
4
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-0465-MMS (Fed. Cl. Oct. 3, 2016)
5
Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00698-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018)
6
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pac. R.R., No. 1:11-cv-01049-PLF-GMH (D.D.C. Sept. 11, 2017)
7
Rabin v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (N.D. Cal., 2017)
8
Duffy v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (D. Kansas , 2017)
9
FCA US, LLC v. Cummins, Inc., No. 16-12883 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2017)
10
Davine v. Golub Corp. (Massachusetts District, 2017)

City of Rockford, et al. v. Mallinckrodt ARD Inc., et al. (Northern District of Illinois, 2018)

Key Insight: Sampling the null set is appropriate and proportional

Nature of Case: Antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: Electronically stored documents generally

Keywords: prescription medication, Acthar, clowns, TAR,

View Case Opinion

U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., No. 11-CV-3406 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 8, 2018)

Key Insight: reproduction of files in TIFF format, review production for responsiveness

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: emails, electronically stored documents, transaction data

Keywords: TIFF, native format, overly burdensome, technology assisted review, TAR, Image Files, Bates number

View Case Opinion

Winfield v. City of New York, No. 1:15-cv-05236-LTS-KHP (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2017)

Key Insight: Methodologies behind TAR are privileged (especially the seed set), the court may also perform in camera review to determine the competency of TAR if necessary, poor TAR practices may allow opposing counsel to set parameters

Nature of Case: Fair Housing Act

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents

Keywords: TAR, FHA, discrimination, predictive coding, in camera review

View Case Opinion

Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-0465-MMS (Fed. Cl. Oct. 3, 2016)

Key Insight: 1500 documents withheld as privileged under procedures in FRE 502 (d);

Nature of Case: Fifth Amendment, taking private property without just compensation

Electronic Data Involved: 1500 documents

Keywords: quick peek, privileged, taking, unjust compensation

View Case Opinion

Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00698-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018)

Key Insight: demand for irrelevant and disproportionate evidence

Nature of Case: breach of patent agreement

Electronic Data Involved: 300 GB emails

Keywords: irrelevant, patent infringement, reasonable limits on discovery

View Case Opinion

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pac. R.R., No. 1:11-cv-01049-PLF-GMH (D.D.C. Sept. 11, 2017)

Key Insight: ability to afford production, parties access to the relevant documents, impact on third parties

Nature of Case: Antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: 467,614 documents from electronic and physical files, 130 GB additional documents

Keywords: scope of discovery, antitrust, Sherman, cost/benefit

View Case Opinion

Rabin v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (N.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: The court allowed a party to use a rolling basis ESI, and ruled that with the assistance of TAR, a few thousand documents could be reviewed in the next few weeks.

Nature of Case: Workplace discrimination (age)

Electronic Data Involved: Business documents/files

Keywords: Predictive coding, TAR, Technology assisted review,

View Case Opinion

Duffy v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (D. Kansas , 2017)

Key Insight: whether production of a random sample is appropriate when full review unduly burdensome

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: patient records

Keywords: random sample, undue burden, statistical sample, prejudice, TAR

View Case Opinion

Davine v. Golub Corp. (Massachusetts District, 2017)

Key Insight: Predictive coding models are legitimate, and document review can stop when the burden outweighs the benefits.

Nature of Case: wage and hour class action

Electronic Data Involved: archived email

Keywords: privilege log, predictive coding,

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.