Winfield v. City of New York, No. 1:15-cv-05236-LTS-KHP (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2017)
Key Insight: Methodologies behind TAR are privileged (especially the seed set), the court may also perform in camera review to determine the competency of TAR if necessary, poor TAR practices may allow opposing counsel to set parameters
Nature of Case: Fair Housing Act
Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents
Keywords: TAR, FHA, discrimination, predictive coding, in camera review