Author - KLG PDF Import

1
Vay v. Huston (WDPa, 2016)
2
Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)
3
In re Eisenstein (Supreme Court of Mo., 2016)
4
Brackett v. Stellar Recovery, Inc. (E.D. Tennesee, 2016)
5
McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)
6
LBBW Luxemburg S.A. v. Wells Fargo Sec. LLC (Southern District of New York, 2016)
7
Odeh v. City of Baton Rouge E. Baton Rouge (Middle District of Lousiana, 2016)
8
9
First Fin. Sec., Inc v. Lee (D. Minn, 2016)
10
Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Vay v. Huston (WDPa, 2016)

Key Insight: Defendant alleges Plaintiff failed to produce documents and requests sanctions, including dismissal.

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: ESI and scanned PDF documents and other documents.

Keywords: Proportionality, motion to compel (not filed)

View Case Opinion

Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)

Key Insight: not ordered to reproduce production of documents in native format (with metadata) but only categories specifically requested by plaintiff

Nature of Case: wrongful termination – contract

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: native format

View Case Opinion

In re Eisenstein (Supreme Court of Mo., 2016)

Key Insight: Concealment and use of electronic evidence improperly obtained by a client.

Nature of Case: Divorce.

Electronic Data Involved: Email, hacked and stolen from the wife’s private email account.

Keywords: Unwarranted intrusions into privileged relationships. Stolen evidence.

Identified State Rule(s): 4-4.4(a); 4-8.4(c); 4-3.4(a)

Brackett v. Stellar Recovery, Inc. (E.D. Tennesee, 2016)

Key Insight: No sanctions when electronically stored information is lost during ordinary course of business.

Nature of Case: Sanctions

Electronic Data Involved: electronically stored information

Keywords: Safe harbor, Rule 37(e), good faith, normal course of business, spoiliation

View Case Opinion

McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)

Key Insight: Plaintiff unsuccessfully seeks injunction to prevent destruction of certain evidence. Defendants argued that sanctions would be inappropriate and no spoliation had occurred.

Nature of Case: Inmate pro se plaintiff asserts a host of constitutional violations against the U.S. and individual prison personnel.

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted video footage.

Keywords: Failure to preserve, destruction of evidence, spoliation, adverse inference.

View Case Opinion

LBBW Luxemburg S.A. v. Wells Fargo Sec. LLC (Southern District of New York, 2016)

Key Insight: Non-responsive documents should not be produced, even if redacted, and privilege or some sort of reason must be asserted for redactions to be proper

Nature of Case: Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents generally

Keywords: redactions, bloomberg, non-responsive

View Case Opinion

Odeh v. City of Baton Rouge E. Baton Rouge (Middle District of Lousiana, 2016)

Key Insight: Production of an plaintiff employee’s own entire email box of 13 years is overbroad and not proportional

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination, whistleblower protection

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents generally

Keywords: proportional, 13 years,

View Case Opinion

First Fin. Sec., Inc v. Lee (D. Minn, 2016)

Key Insight: Magistrate recommended sanctions for defendants’ willful failure to comply with his discovery order. No finding of bad faith.

Nature of Case: Breach of contract.

Electronic Data Involved: Defendant emails and text messages.

Keywords: “Strong circumstantial evidence” that the defendants had concealed documents. Adverse inference instructions and legal costs imposed by court.

View Case Opinion

Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Key Insight: limited additional discovery on the issue of conflict of interest and bias in the administration of the claim

Nature of Case: ERISA

Electronic Data Involved: 5 depositions and written discovery responses

Keywords: limited additional discovery, discovery duplication, scope of discovery

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.