Author - KLG PDF Import

1
Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016).
2
In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc., No. 12-cv-3536 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2016).
3
AVM Technologies LLC v. Intel Corp. (D. Del., 2016)
4
Swetlic Chiropractic & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. (S.D. Ohio, 2016)
5
Martin v. Stoops Buick, Inc. (S.D. Ind., 2016)
6
National Football League Mgmt. Council v. National Football League Players Assoc. (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016)
7
State of Louisiana v. Demontre Smith (Louisiana, 2016)
8
Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc. (District Court of Kansas, 2016)
9
First Niagara Risk Management v. Folino (United States District Court, Eastern District Pennsylvania., 2016)
10
Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).

Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016).

Key Insight: Plaintiff threatened legal action, but failed to have it’s vendor stop automatic deletion and did not preserve recrods when email system changed. Defendant was prejudiced by this spoilation. Court allowed witnesses to testify to spoilation and potential contents of those communications.

Nature of Case: incentive programs and Robinson-Patman Act violations

Electronic Data Involved: internal and external communications

Keywords: spoilation; vendor

View Case Opinion

AVM Technologies LLC v. Intel Corp. (D. Del., 2016)

Key Insight: court allows keyword search of one database (agreed to by party) but denies search of three others deeming them disproportionate

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: database

Keywords: keyword search, disproportionate,

National Football League Mgmt. Council v. National Football League Players Assoc. (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016)

Key Insight: Adverse inference when Brady destroyed cell phone days and subsequently punished for non-cooperation before trial was proper

Nature of Case: Collective Bargaining Agreement

Electronic Data Involved: Cell phone data

Keywords: football, Tom Brady, deflategate, collective bargaining agreement,

View Case Opinion

Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc. (District Court of Kansas, 2016)

Key Insight: whether stating that “ESI request is not relevant or proportional” is not sufficient.

Nature of Case: breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: emails

Keywords: informal internal emails

Identified State Rule(s): D. Kan. 37(2)

View Case Opinion

First Niagara Risk Management v. Folino (United States District Court, Eastern District Pennsylvania., 2016)

Key Insight: Proportionality, Fraud

Nature of Case: Non-compete enforcement

Electronic Data Involved: scope of discovery

Keywords: Sedona principles

View Case Opinion

Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).

Key Insight: Court concluded defendant had duty to preserve oily substance and was negligent in doing so. Permissive adverse inference instruction granted.

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: oily substance plaintiff slipped on

Keywords: adverse inference;

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.