Archive: March 27, 2019

1
Wakefield v. Visalus, Inc. (District Court of Oregon, 2019)
2
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al v. QUVA PHARMA, INC. et al (D. N.J., 2019)
3
Lareau v. Nw. Med. Ctr., No. 2:17-cv-81 (D. Vt. Mar. 27, 2019)

PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al v. QUVA PHARMA, INC. et al (D. N.J., 2019)

Key Insight: denied forensic imaging of ESI because too expensive and intrusive

Nature of Case: Trade Secret Misappropriation

Electronic Data Involved: Forensic imaging of ESI

Keywords: mentions Sedona principles

View Case Opinion

Lareau v. Nw. Med. Ctr., No. 2:17-cv-81 (D. Vt. Mar. 27, 2019)

Key Insight: parties unable to identify search terms that satisfy court direction for “appropriate search terms.” Attorney is not required to offer opposing counsel his or her own ideas about how to narrow a particular search.

Nature of Case: wrongful termination

Electronic Data Involved: approximately 24,000 emails

Keywords: reasonable scope, search terms, format, sampling

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.