Archive: February 2019

1
Locke v. Swift Transportation Co. (W.D. Ky., 2019)
2
Gabiola et al v. Keesee et al (N.D. Ill., 2019)
3
Ennis-Flint, Inc. v. Greer No. 18-CVS-3612, 2019 NCBC 11 (N.C. Business Court Feb. 4, 2019)
4
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)
5
Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 17-cv-04405 (N.D. Cal., 2019)

RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)

Key Insight: objections to requests for production, overly broad requests, overly broad objections, merit-less objections

Nature of Case: Hospital Fraud, laboratory tests billing scheme, insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Billing data, invoices, financial records

Keywords: fifth amendment, overly broad, unduly burdensome, preservation efforts, retention notice, objection specificity

View Case Opinion

Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 17-cv-04405 (N.D. Cal., 2019)

Key Insight: It is common practice to prohibit redactions for relevance for the protection of non-parties when there is a stipulated protective order to designate sensitive documents as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: documents with relevance redactions applied by a third party

Keywords: third party redaction, protective order, relevance

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.