Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 17-cv-04405 (N.D. Cal., 2019)
Key Insight: It is common practice to prohibit redactions for relevance for the protection of non-parties when there is a stipulated protective order to designate sensitive documents as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”
Nature of Case: patent infringement
Electronic Data Involved: documents with relevance redactions applied by a third party
Keywords: third party redaction, protective order, relevance