Archive - 2018

1
Brown v. Sam?s West Inc. (Nevada District, 2018)
2
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. ePRO E-Commerce Ltd., No. 16-3637-cv (L) (2nd Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)
3
Martinez v. City of New York (Eastern District of New York, 2018)
4
In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)
5
Dotson, et al. v. Edmonson, et al., No. 16-15371 (E.D. La. Jan. 22, 2018)
6
Cordoba v. Pulido (N.D. Cal., 2018)
7
Tipp v. Adeptus Health Incorporated et al (D. Ariz., 2018)
8
Wesley Corporation, et al., v. Zoom T.V. Products, LLC, et al., No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018)
9
White v. U.S., No. 4:15-cv-01252-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jan. 9, 2018)
10
Apex Mort. Corp. v. Great N. Ins. Co., No, 17 C 3376 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2018)

Brown v. Sam?s West Inc. (Nevada District, 2018)

Key Insight: Adverse inference instruct sanction correct because party failed to preserve video evidence when overhauling system

Nature of Case: sip and fall, premises liability

Electronic Data Involved: video

Keywords: adverse inference instructions, culpable state of mind, destroying video

View Case Opinion

Klipsch Group, Inc. v. ePRO E-Commerce Ltd., No. 16-3637-cv (L) (2nd Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)

Key Insight: Intentional spoliation/persistent discovery misconduct can lead to sanctions well above the amount in dispute

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (trademark infringement/counterfeit)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: Sanctions, proportionality, willfully, adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Martinez v. City of New York (Eastern District of New York, 2018)

Key Insight: Extreme misconduct by defendant leads to recommendation of termination sanctions

Nature of Case: Civil rights violations (police excessive force)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic records generally

Keywords: retrospect, contempt, sanctions, Agiwal factors, repeated and numerous violations,

View Case Opinion

In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance and proportionality

Nature of Case: false advertising

Electronic Data Involved: documents, communications

Keywords: relevant, proportional, reconsideration, additional discovery, custodial files, protective order, third party discovery

View Case Opinion

Dotson, et al. v. Edmonson, et al., No. 16-15371 (E.D. La. Jan. 22, 2018)

Key Insight: Defendants turned in employer owned/funded cell phones a month after litigation filed; was not spoilation and no sanctions given

Nature of Case: Civil Rights Violation

Electronic Data Involved: Cell Phone Records

Keywords: spoilation, duty of preservation

View Case Opinion

Cordoba v. Pulido (N.D. Cal., 2018)

Key Insight: whether a permissive adverse inference instruction should be permitted; if so, whether spoliating party should be permitted to offer evidence to justify spoliation

Nature of Case: sexual harassment/abuse

Electronic Data Involved: hard copy

Keywords: permissive adverse inference, permitting spoliating party to explain, negligent failure to preserve

View Case Opinion

Tipp v. Adeptus Health Incorporated et al (D. Ariz., 2018)

Key Insight: While shredded physical notes are not ESI, and thus not governed by FRCP 37(e), the court finds it a helpful rationale in deciding the proper course of action.

Nature of Case: Civil Rights

Electronic Data Involved: handwritten notes

Keywords: adverse inference, spoliation sanctions,

View Case Opinion

Wesley Corporation, et al., v. Zoom T.V. Products, LLC, et al., No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018)

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections to discovery requests can lead to sanctions without being specifically tailored to the request

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (patent and trademark infringement), breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: boilerplate, obstructionism, objections

View Case Opinion

Apex Mort. Corp. v. Great N. Ins. Co., No, 17 C 3376 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2018)

Key Insight: Court narrowed scope of some plaintiff requests and ordered defendant to clarify privilege claims on withheld documents

Nature of Case: bad faith; insurance coverage

Electronic Data Involved: claims file of insurer

Keywords: privilege; responsiveness

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.