Archive - February 17, 2017

1
Oppenheimer v. City of La Habra (Central District of California, Southern Division, 2017)
2
Excel Enterprises, LLC v. Winona PVD Coatings, LLC, No. 3:16-cv-19-WCL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Feb. 17, 2017)

Oppenheimer v. City of La Habra (Central District of California, Southern Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Rule 37 does not directly address destruction of video footage.

Nature of Case: prisoner suicide

Electronic Data Involved: video footage, emails, text messages

Keywords: destruction video, spoliation video

View Case Opinion

Excel Enterprises, LLC v. Winona PVD Coatings, LLC, No. 3:16-cv-19-WCL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Feb. 17, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant produced in format requested by Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed motion to compel on grounds documents not matched up to requests. Due to burden on Defendant and lack of prejudice to Plaintiff, Defendant not required to change format of production.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract

Electronic Data Involved: ESI Production

Keywords: Format; ordinary course of business

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.