Tag:FRCP 34(c) Objections

1
DR Distrib., LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (N.D. Ill., 2019)
2
Gabiola et al v. Keesee et al (N.D. Ill., 2019)
3
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)
4
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. et al (S.D. Cal., 2018)
5
The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, et al., No. 3:16-cv-00203-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 27, 2018)
6
Entrata v. Yardi Systems (D. Utah, 2018)
7
The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, Et Al. (Middle District of Louisana, 2018)
8
Wesley Corporation, et al., v. Zoom T.V. Products, LLC, et al., No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018)
9
Holick v. Burkhart ( No. 16-1188-JTM (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2017), 2017)
10
Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-18-D (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017).

DR Distrib., LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (N.D. Ill., 2019)

Key Insight: Plaintiffs object to dismissal of a counterclaim against them because Defendant’s desire to dismiss the claim is related to loss of relevant ESI

Nature of Case: defamation, trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail, instant messages

Keywords: counterclaim, motion to amend, diligent, dismissal

View Case Opinion

RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)

Key Insight: objections to requests for production, overly broad requests, overly broad objections, merit-less objections

Nature of Case: Hospital Fraud, laboratory tests billing scheme, insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Billing data, invoices, financial records

Keywords: fifth amendment, overly broad, unduly burdensome, preservation efforts, retention notice, objection specificity

View Case Opinion

Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. et al (S.D. Cal., 2018)

Key Insight: Objection to RFP unreasonable on basis that opposing party failed to provide search terms since each party has independent obligation to produce relevant documents but noted failure to participate

Nature of Case: Patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: emails and business records

Keywords: search terms

View Case Opinion

The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, et al., No. 3:16-cv-00203-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 27, 2018)

Key Insight: Discovery costs must be proportional to the amount in controversy ($20 million in dispute allows for at least $13,000 in discovery costs)

Nature of Case: Contract breach

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents/communications

Entrata v. Yardi Systems (D. Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: objection that requests are not relevant because requesting party’s defense is meritless is sanctionable

Nature of Case: interception of communication, defamation

Electronic Data Involved: email, text messages, calendars

Keywords: improper objection sanctioned

View Case Opinion

The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, Et Al. (Middle District of Louisana, 2018)

Key Insight: Discovery costs must be proportional to the amount in controversy ($20 million in dispute allows for at least $13,000 in discovery costs)

Nature of Case: Contract breach

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents/communications

Keywords: Backup tapes, proportionality, catastrophic failure

View Case Opinion

Wesley Corporation, et al., v. Zoom T.V. Products, LLC, et al., No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018)

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections to discovery requests can lead to sanctions without being specifically tailored to the request

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (patent and trademark infringement), breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: boilerplate, obstructionism, objections

View Case Opinion

Holick v. Burkhart ( No. 16-1188-JTM (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2017), 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff did not specify whether any documents were being withheld in the course of making objections to discovery motions

Nature of Case: libel, assault, slander

Electronic Data Involved: documents and communications posted or stored on social media, e-mails

Keywords: “facially overbroad”, “anti-abortion”, “nearly two-decade time frame”, “provide any responsive information for the past seven (7) years”

View Case Opinion

Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-18-D (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017).

Key Insight: Jury Instruction due to failure to preserve electronically stored information.

Nature of Case: Defamation

Electronic Data Involved: Web browser history, Internet browser

Keywords: Web browser history, Spoliation

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.