Tag:Format Of Production

1
Bailey v. Alpha Techs., Inc., No. C16-0727-JCC, 2017 WL 2378921 (W.D. Wash. June 1, 2017)
2
Wilson v. Washington, No. C16-5366 BHS, 2017 WL 518615 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 8, 2017)
3
Am. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hawaii Nut & Bolt, Inc., No. 15-00245 ACK-KSC, 2017 WL 80248 (D. Hawai?I Jan. 9, 2017)
4
City of Seattle v. ZyLAB North America, LLC (Western District of Washington, Seattle, 2017)
5
Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corp., et al., No. 14-11872 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2017)
6
In re Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (S.D. Ind., 2017)
7
Pertile et al. v. General Motors LLC, No. 1:15-cv-00518-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Aug. 31, 2017)
8
Hugler v. Jasper Contractors, 1:16-cv-3845-LMM-JSA (ND Ga, 2017)
9
In Re State Farm Lloyds, Relator, Nos. 15-0903, 15-0905 (Tex. Sup. Ct. May 26, 2017)
10
Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Wilson v. Washington, No. C16-5366 BHS, 2017 WL 518615 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 8, 2017)

Key Insight: Addressing Plaintiff?s concerns regarding Defendants production, characterized by the court as ?thousands of pages of unorganized documents,? the court reasoned that ?Rule 33(d) does not supplant a party?s duty to adequately label and identify responsive documents under Rule 34,? that courts have recognized that production of documents as kept in the usual course of business ?may require the producing party to include different identifying information according to the type of document or file produced,? and that ?the most recent? court decisions have held that both Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(i) and (ii) apply to the production of ESI and concluded that Defendant?s response fell short of its duties under 34(b)(2)(E) and 33(d)(1) and stated that ?[s]ome form of further organization or specification is required to signify that they have provided ?rationally organized productions??

Electronic Data Involved: Unorganized ESI

City of Seattle v. ZyLAB North America, LLC (Western District of Washington, Seattle, 2017)

Key Insight: Method of production requiring out-of state travel not contract breach and retention of counsel not enough to show material is privileged

Nature of Case: breach of contract, consumer protection act litigation

Electronic Data Involved: audit documents

Keywords: proportionality, foreign parent, method of production, privilege determination

View Case Opinion

Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corp., et al., No. 14-11872 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff produced two versions of email (both dated before filing). Defendant argued one was fake and an attempt to bolster Plaintiff’s claim. Court deemed that dismissal was too harsh a sanction and denied dismissal sanction request.

Nature of Case: Family Medical Leave Act Violations

Electronic Data Involved: E-Mails

Keywords: Duplicate E-mail; Dismissal Sanction

View Case Opinion

Pertile et al. v. General Motors LLC, No. 1:15-cv-00518-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Aug. 31, 2017)

Key Insight: When ESI is relevant, they must be provided in a format that is readable by opposing counsel

Nature of Case: Personal injury (product liability, car accident)

Electronic Data Involved: Computer modeling files

Keywords: GM, Chevrolet Silverado, rollover,

View Case Opinion

Hugler v. Jasper Contractors, 1:16-cv-3845-LMM-JSA (ND Ga, 2017)

Key Insight: petitioner’s motion for contempt, subpoena enforcement

Nature of Case: subpoena duces tecum issued by US Dept. of Labor to Respondent, a roofing company. Workplace safety violations and follow-up inspections..

Electronic Data Involved: text and email messages

Keywords: subpoena duces tecum, failure to take reasonable steps to comply with the order

View Case Opinion

Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant has inadequate production even when supplemented. Judge ordered meet-and-confer to work out some of the disagreements. Judge did not give either side sanctions.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract; Consumer Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail; Electronic Database

Keywords: Meet-and-confer; Inadequate Production; Supplemental Production

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.