Tag:Discoverability Scope, Including FRCP 26(b)(1) Scope (Prior to Dec. 1, 2015)

1
Wentz v. Project Veritas et al (M.D. Fla., 2019)
2
Hunters Run Gun Club v. Baker, No. 3:17-cv-00176 (M.D. La, 2019)
3
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)
4
Fair v. Communications Unlimited, Inc. (E.D. MO, 2019)
5
Santana v. MKA2 Enterprises, Inc. (D. Kan., 2019)
6
Hallmark Licensing LLC v. Dickens Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2018)
7
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. et al (S.D. Cal., 2018)
8
Dufrene v. American Tugs Inc. (District Court of Eastern Louisiana, 2018)
9
Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., No. 18-0105-EFM-KGG (D. Kan. Oct. 31, 2018)
10
Entrata v. Yardi Systems (D. Utah, 2018)

Wentz v. Project Veritas et al (M.D. Fla., 2019)

Key Insight: objection that requests are not relevant because requesting party’s defense is meritless is sanctionable

Nature of Case: interception of communication, defamation

Electronic Data Involved: email, text messages, calendars

Keywords: improper objection sanctioned

View Case Opinion

Hunters Run Gun Club v. Baker, No. 3:17-cv-00176 (M.D. La, 2019)

Key Insight: The refusal to provide written authorization allowing a service provider to release text message records constitutes “possession, custody, or control” of those text messages.

Nature of Case: lease termination by law enforcement

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: release of records, written authorization

View Case Opinion

RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)

Key Insight: objections to requests for production, overly broad requests, overly broad objections, merit-less objections

Nature of Case: Hospital Fraud, laboratory tests billing scheme, insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Billing data, invoices, financial records

Keywords: fifth amendment, overly broad, unduly burdensome, preservation efforts, retention notice, objection specificity

View Case Opinion

Fair v. Communications Unlimited, Inc. (E.D. MO, 2019)

Key Insight: P subpoenaed for documents from a third-party after failing to receive the same information from defendant

Nature of Case: employment dispute

Electronic Data Involved: contracts/agreements, subcontractor agreements, financial information, e-mail

Keywords: subcontractor, independent contractor, technician, subpoena, third-party, undue burden on a person subject to subpoena

View Case Opinion

Santana v. MKA2 Enterprises, Inc. (D. Kan., 2019)

Key Insight: denied as overbroad but ordered to produce responsive text messages

Nature of Case: workplace discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: cell phone data and text messages

Keywords: cant request all call info with coworkers, only relevant documents

View Case Opinion

Hallmark Licensing LLC v. Dickens Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff and Defendant’s motions to compel are both granted and denied in part

Nature of Case: Trademark rights, and when TM protection ends

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, telephone call, business documents, the product in question, interrogatories

Keywords: Trademark, trade secrets, modification, proportional, executive

View Case Opinion

Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. et al (S.D. Cal., 2018)

Key Insight: Objection to RFP unreasonable on basis that opposing party failed to provide search terms since each party has independent obligation to produce relevant documents but noted failure to participate

Nature of Case: Patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: emails and business records

Keywords: search terms

View Case Opinion

Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., No. 18-0105-EFM-KGG (D. Kan. Oct. 31, 2018)

Key Insight: relevance, proportionality, undue burden, relative access

Nature of Case: contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: sweeping document request

Keywords: motion to quash, defunct entity, third party subpoena

View Case Opinion

Entrata v. Yardi Systems (D. Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: objection that requests are not relevant because requesting party’s defense is meritless is sanctionable

Nature of Case: interception of communication, defamation

Electronic Data Involved: email, text messages, calendars

Keywords: improper objection sanctioned

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.