Tag: Data Privacy

1
hiQ Labs Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation (ND California, 2017)
2
T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)
3
Borum v. Smith, No. 17-CV-00017-JHM, 2017 WL 3014487 (W.D. Ky. July 14, 2017)
4
Miller v. Zara USA, 2017 NY Slip Op 04407 [151 AD3d 462] (N.Y. App. June 6, 2017)
5
Iris Mediaworks, Ltd. v. Vasisht (Sup. Ct. N.Y., 2017)
6
Iris Mediaworks, Ltd. v. Vasisht (Sup. Ct. N.Y., 2017)
7
TLS Mgmt. and Mktg. Services v. Rodriguez-Toledo, No. 15-2121 (BJM), 2017 WL 115743 (D. P.R. March 27, 2017)
8
United States v. Lambis (Southern District of New York, 2016)
9
In re Eisenstein (Supreme Court of Mo., 2016)
10
In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability Litigation (Eastern district of Louisiana MDL, 2016)

hiQ Labs Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation (ND California, 2017)

Key Insight: if use of publicly available information provided by a source for profit can be restricted by the source of the information

Nature of Case: violation of computer fraud and abuse act.

Electronic Data Involved: publicly available information available on websites like linkedin

Keywords: public interest, publicly available data, preliminary injunction

View Case Opinion

T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Keyword searching alone may not be sufficient and can be aided by strategies like predictive coding

Nature of Case: civil rights, fourth amendment

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, social media posts

Keywords: keyword searching, predictive coding

View Case Opinion

Borum v. Smith, No. 17-CV-00017-JHM, 2017 WL 3014487 (W.D. Ky. July 14, 2017)

Key Insight: mere statement that disclosure would provide competitors with advantage doesn’t satisfy elements of trade secret.

Nature of Case: medical negligence

Electronic Data Involved: electronic health record (EHR) system

Keywords: confidential and proprietary trade secrets, protective order

View Case Opinion

Miller v. Zara USA, 2017 NY Slip Op 04407 [151 AD3d 462] (N.Y. App. June 6, 2017)

Key Insight: Attorney client privilege and work product protections for communications from company devices

Nature of Case: employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Company laptop data

Keywords: attorney client privilege, computer forensics, privacy policy, work product

Identified State Rule(s): CPLR 3103

Iris Mediaworks, Ltd. v. Vasisht (Sup. Ct. N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant hacking of Plaintiff business email account, including confidential attorney-client communications.

Nature of Case: Trade secrets violation

Electronic Data Involved: business email account

Keywords: Email theft, hacking, sanctions.

Identified Local Court Rule(s): defendant showed a “disregard for the judicial process.”

TLS Mgmt. and Mktg. Services v. Rodriguez-Toledo, No. 15-2121 (BJM), 2017 WL 115743 (D. P.R. March 27, 2017)

Key Insight: ESI “willfully discarded or deleted”

Nature of Case: Alleged violations of the electronic Communications Privacy Act against defendants accused of stealing plaintiff’s clients and confidential information.

Electronic Data Involved: defendant’s iPhone, laptop and external hard drive

Keywords: adverse-inference instruction, forensic examination of a flash drive.

View Case Opinion

In re Eisenstein (Supreme Court of Mo., 2016)

Key Insight: Concealment and use of electronic evidence improperly obtained by a client.

Nature of Case: Divorce.

Electronic Data Involved: Email, hacked and stolen from the wife’s private email account.

Keywords: Unwarranted intrusions into privileged relationships. Stolen evidence.

Identified State Rule(s): 4-4.4(a); 4-8.4(c); 4-3.4(a)

In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability Litigation (Eastern district of Louisiana MDL, 2016)

Key Insight: personnel files are not maintained by the custodian, they are maintained by HR and contain personal information and are not discoverable

Nature of Case: products liability

Electronic Data Involved: employee personnel files of people that plaintiffs want to depose

Keywords: discoverability, relevancy, personnel files

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.