Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Times Publ’g Co. v. City of Clearwater, 830 So.2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
2
United States v. Sungard Data Sys., 173 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2001)
3
Xpedior Creditor Trust v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 2003 WL 22283835 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2003)
4
R.S. Creative, Inc. v. Creative Cotton, Ltd., 89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 353 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)
5
Fuller v. Instinet, Inc., 2004 WL 3699810 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2004)
6
Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1982)
7
Black & Veatch Int’l Co. v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., 211 F.R.D. 641 (D. Kan. 2002)
8
Columbia Valley Reg’l Med. Ctr. v. Bannert, 112 S.W. 3d 193 (Tex. App. 2003)
9
Dow Chem. Co. v. Allen, 672 F.2d 1262 (7th Cir. 1982)
10
Go2Net, Inc. v. C I Host, Inc., 60 P.3d 1245 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

Times Publ’g Co. v. City of Clearwater, 830 So.2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Key Insight: Email stored in government computers does not automatically become public records by virtue of that storage; private or personal email fell outside the statutory definition of “public records”

Nature of Case: Newspaper sued city to release as public record all email sent from or received by two city employees

Electronic Data Involved: Email

United States v. Sungard Data Sys., 173 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2001)

Key Insight: Motion to preclude in-house counsel from having access to confidential information produced by competitors denied; court established detailed protective order for handling of confidential information

Nature of Case: Antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents

Xpedior Creditor Trust v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 2003 WL 22283835 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2003)

Key Insight: Motion for protective order requiring plaintiff to share the cost of restoring computer files denied; Zubulake judge applied Zubulake factors and concluded that cost-shifting was not appropriate

Nature of Case: Breach of contract class action

Electronic Data Involved: Computer files housed on decommissioned systems

R.S. Creative, Inc. v. Creative Cotton, Ltd., 89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 353 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)

Key Insight: Trial court properly imposed terminating sanctions against plaintiff for egregious discovery abuses, including the deletion of files from hard drives after plaintiff had stipulated that computers and diskettes would not be operated or touched until defendants’ computer expert could examine them

Nature of Case: Breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Hard drive, computer files

Fuller v. Instinet, Inc., 2004 WL 3699810 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2004)

Key Insight: Court denied plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants to provide affidavits of all employees with access to employment databases and hiring practices, in order to establish whether any documents or data was destroyed, since discovery had been closed for one year and there was no evidence that defendants had destroyed documents

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Hiring and employment database and records

Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1982)

Key Insight: Court did not abuse discretion in denying request for computer tapes where requesting party already possessed all information from tapes on wage cards and were not deprived of any data

Electronic Data Involved: Computer tapes containing wage information

Black & Veatch Int’l Co. v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., 211 F.R.D. 641 (D. Kan. 2002)

Key Insight: Plaintiff failed to comply with court order by making various misrepresentations about whether all original input files were produced and whether software program changed over time it was used; sanction in form of attorneys’ fees and costs warranted

Nature of Case: Construction litigation

Electronic Data Involved: Software program and input files used to make design calculations

Go2Net, Inc. v. C I Host, Inc., 60 P.3d 1245 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

Key Insight: Motion for reconsideration of order granting of summary judgment properly denied where party failed to show that email from repaired server that was produced the day before summary judgment hearing qualified as “newly discovered evidence”

Nature of Case: Action to enforce advertising agreements

Electronic Data Involved: Email

Copyright © 2025, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.