Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 17-cv-04405 (N.D. Cal., 2019)

Key Insight: It is common practice to prohibit redactions for relevance for the protection of non-parties when there is a stipulated protective order to designate sensitive documents as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: documents with relevance redactions applied by a third party

Keywords: third party redaction, protective order, relevance

View Case Opinion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.