Hayse v. City of Melvindale, No. Civ. A. 17-13294 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2018)

Key Insight: Non-party ESI must be in the possession, custody or control; phone not city owned, no consent given by city official- did not require production; prior phone and service provider required supplemental briefing regarding service provider contractual obligations

Nature of Case: Civil Rights

Electronic Data Involved: Cell Phone/Text Messages

Keywords: text messages, phones, service provider, consent, ownership

View Case Opinion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.