Dremak v. Urban Outfitter (Cal. App., 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant incurred costs that were “reasonable and necessary to the litigation” via a “time consuming process”, and thus were awarded the costs from the opposing party.

Nature of Case: Violation of the Credit Card Act, class action

Electronic Data Involved: Wide range of documents

Keywords: Predictive coding, seed set, “reasonable and necessary”, Predictive coding cost

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.