Lowrey v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co., No. 2:17-cv-00831-RSL, 2017 WL 3769424 (Washington, Western District, 2017)

Key Insight: The Stipulated Protective Order is too broad and is not consistent with the RCP

Nature of Case: Transgender/sex employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: confidential documents, Stipulated Protective Order

Keywords: Stipulated Protective Order, confidential, Rules of Civil Procedure

View Case Opinion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.