Allen v. City of Chicago, No. 09 C 243, 2013 WL 1966363 (N.D. Ill. May 10, 2013)
Key Insight: Court approved recovery of costs related to making one set of copies of the at issue documents, including bates labeling , but found that the city had ?not met its burden of establishing that the additional expenses, including scanning, OCR, and the production of a master DVD, were reasonably necessary under ? 1920(4)?
Nature of Case: Unlawful retaliation under Title VII
Electronic Data Involved: taxable costs