Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Sonnino v. Univ. of Kansas Hosp. Auth., 220 F.R.D. 633 (D. Kan. 2004)
2
3M v. Pribyl, 259 F.3d 587, 606 n.5 (7th Cir. 2001)
3
United States v. Stewart, 294 F. Supp. 2d 490 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
4
Wright v. AmSouth Bancorporation, 320 F.3d 1198 (11th Cir. 2003)
5
Dean v. Priceline.com, Inc., 2002 WL 34155897 (D. Conn. Sept. 10, 2002)
6
Schnall v. Annuity and Life RE (Holdings), Ltd., 2004 WL 51117 (D. Conn. Jan. 2, 2004)
7
Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1982)
8
Black & Veatch Int’l Co. v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., 211 F.R.D. 641 (D. Kan. 2002)
9
Columbia Valley Reg’l Med. Ctr. v. Bannert, 112 S.W. 3d 193 (Tex. App. 2003)
10
Dow Chem. Co. v. Allen, 672 F.2d 1262 (7th Cir. 1982)

Sonnino v. Univ. of Kansas Hosp. Auth., 220 F.R.D. 633 (D. Kan. 2004)

Key Insight: Defendant ordered to provide a complete and full response to interrogatory seeking information about Hospital Authority’s computer and email systems; defendant’s “very brief and general response” was insufficient

Nature of Case: Former employee alleged violations of free speech, due process and gender discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Information re computer and email systems

3M v. Pribyl, 259 F.3d 587, 606 n.5 (7th Cir. 2001)

Key Insight: Negative inference instruction warranted where six gigabytes of music were downloaded onto hard drive the night before the computer was to be turned over for inspection

Nature of Case: Manufacturer sued former employees and their new competing company for misappropriation of trade secrets

Electronic Data Involved: Hard drive

United States v. Stewart, 294 F. Supp. 2d 490 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

Key Insight: Court denied Stewart’s motion to disqualify the attorney who inadvertently read Stewart’s email from cross-examining her or participating in the preparation of her cross-examination

Nature of Case: Criminal proceedings re Stewart’s sale of ImClone stock

Electronic Data Involved: Email

Wright v. AmSouth Bancorporation, 320 F.3d 1198 (11th Cir. 2003)

Key Insight: No abuse of discretion to deny plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery of “computer diskette or tape copy of all word processing files created, modified and/or access by, or on behalf” of five employees over 2-1/2 year period as overbroad and unduly burdensome

Nature of Case: Age discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Word processing files

Dean v. Priceline.com, Inc., 2002 WL 34155897 (D. Conn. Sept. 10, 2002)

Key Insight: Court ordered defendant to produce to plaintiff information in the possession of a third party storage facility, with each side paying one-half of the charges billed by the third party for retrieving the information; court further ruled that the prevailing party would be entitled to recover from the losing party its share of the costs associated with retrieval of the information

Nature of Case: FLSA claim

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents

Schnall v. Annuity and Life RE (Holdings), Ltd., 2004 WL 51117 (D. Conn. Jan. 2, 2004)

Key Insight: Where defendants had actual notice of allegations against them and affirmatively stated that they were fully aware of their preservation obligations under PSLRA and sanctions for failure to comply, court declined to enter preservation order

Nature of Case: Securities litigation

Electronic Data Involved: Documents, data compilations (including electronically recorded or stored data), and tangible objects

Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1982)

Key Insight: Court did not abuse discretion in denying request for computer tapes where requesting party already possessed all information from tapes on wage cards and were not deprived of any data

Electronic Data Involved: Computer tapes containing wage information

Black & Veatch Int’l Co. v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., 211 F.R.D. 641 (D. Kan. 2002)

Key Insight: Plaintiff failed to comply with court order by making various misrepresentations about whether all original input files were produced and whether software program changed over time it was used; sanction in form of attorneys’ fees and costs warranted

Nature of Case: Construction litigation

Electronic Data Involved: Software program and input files used to make design calculations

Copyright © 2025, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.