Bolger v. D.C., 608 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2009)
Key Insight: Where defendants admitted destroying relevant radio communications but argued that such destruction was not sanctionable because it unintentionally occurred as the result of a routine operation of the police communication systems and because the information destroyed was of minimal relevance, court found that defendants were under an obligation to preserve and had (at least) negligently destroyed the radio communications, but declined to order an adverse inference because plaintiff?s proffer of evidence regarding the communications? relevance and the proper inference from their destruction was ?too speculative?
Nature of Case: ? 1983 Action against D.C. police for constitutional violations
Electronic Data Involved: Radio communications (“radio runs”)