Electronic Discovery Law

Posted at 9:29 AM on November 30, 2010 by K&L Gates

District Court Declines to Order Incarceration for Defendant's Bad Faith Spoliation but Orders Monetary Sanction of $337,796.37

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. ("Victor Stanley II")

As previously summarized on this blog, defendant Mark Pappas, President of Creative Pipe, Inc., was ordered to “be imprisoned for a period not to exceed two (2) years, unless and until he [paid] to Plaintiff the attorney’s fees and costs that will be awarded…” as a sanction for willful, bad faith discovery violations which the Magistrate Judge ruled would be treated as contempt of the Court. On defendants’ appeal, the District Court Judge declined to adopt the Magistrate Judge’s order regarding incarceration:

[T]he court does not find it appropriate to Order Defendant Pappas incarcerated for future possible failure to comply with his obligation to make payment of an amount to be determined in the course of further proceedings. Certainly, if Defendant Pappas should fail to comply with a specific payment order, the Court may issue an order requiring him to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for failure to comply wit that payment order. Also, under appropriate circumstances, criminal contempt proceedings might be considered.

The court upheld the Magistrate Judge’s order and recommendations in all other respects, however, and ordered defendants to pay plaintiff Victor Stanley, Inc. $337,796.37 as a sanction for their bad faith spoliation.

A copy of the District Court’s Memorandum and Order Re: Appeal from Order of Magistrate Judge is available here.

A copy of the District Court’s Order re: Spoliation Sanctions is available here.

A copy of the District Court’s Order Requiring Defendants to Pay Sanctions is available here.

Trackbacks (1) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/admin/trackback/231396

Applied Discovery - December 2, 2010 8:47 PM

Weekly E-Discovery Snapshot from Applied Discovery http://bit.ly/eOSNTL Last week's holiday travel

Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end

This blog/Web site is made available by the contributing lawyers or law firm publisher solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general legal principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. By using this blog/Web site, you understand that there is no attorney client relationship intended or formed between you and the blog/Web site publisher or any contributing lawyer. The blog/Web site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of more than 40 fully integrated offices located in North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations and registrations, visit www.klgates.com.

Portions of this Web site may contain Attorney Advertising under the rules of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

e-Discovery Analysis & Technology group at K&L Gates, offering services related to ediscovery, review of electronic documents, electronic discovery and electronic evidence discovery.
K&L Gates LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98104-1158
p. 206.623.7580, f. 206.623.7022