Electronic Discovery Law

New York State Unified Court System Report Makes Recommendations for Improved Handling of E-Discovery

In New York, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman and Chief Administrative Judge Ann Pfau released a report recommending improvements for how electronic discovery is handled in New York State Courts.  The report, based on “extensive research and interviews with experts in electronic discovery”, addresses the problems of electronic discovery, including cost and delay, and provides several recommendations on how "the courts  can manage e-discovery in a more expert, efficient and cost-effective manner within the framework of existing law."

“Key recommendations” as identified by the press release announcing the report include:

- Establishment of an e-discovery working group to serve as a statewide resource for expertise and training;

- An addition to the Preliminary Conference form to highlight e-discovery issues and responsibilities;

- Consideration of a court rule requiring counsel appearing at the preliminary conference to be competent to discuss client technology systems;

- A pilot project designating e-discovery specialists to assist judges in supervising and resolving protracted e-discovery disputes;

- Creation of an e-discovery journal by the judiciary reporting relevant decisions and trends; and

- Pilot projects in selected courts regarding disclosure of e-discovery issues and e-discovery compliance.

A full copy of the report is available here.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/admin/trackback/194986
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
This blog/Web site is made available by the contributing lawyers or law firm publisher solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general legal principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. By using this blog/Web site, you understand that there is no attorney client relationship intended or formed between you and the blog/Web site publisher or any contributing lawyer. The blog/Web site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of more than 40 fully integrated offices located in North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations and registrations, visit www.klgates.com.

Portions of this Web site may contain Attorney Advertising under the rules of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

e-Discovery Analysis & Technology group at K&L Gates, offering services related to ediscovery, review of electronic documents, electronic discovery and electronic evidence discovery.
K&L Gates LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98104-1158
p. 206.623.7580, f. 206.623.7022