Court Denies Relief Where Party Ignored Court’s Suggestions for Reducing Volume of ESI Captured by Keyword Search: “Defendants Must Now Lie in the Bed that They Have Made”
Kipperman v. Onex Corp., 2008 WL 4372005 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 19, 2008)
In this case, Onex presented several motions to the court, including a motion for a protective order and for relief from the need to produce all documents identified after searching several backup tapes. The court denied in part and granted in part Onex’s motion, and ordered Onex to produce all identified documents, except for two specific categories deemed unlikely to contain relevant information.