Electronic Discovery Law
RAM Ruling Portends a New E-Discovery Brawl
By Jesse Seyfer from The Recorder:
A federal magistrate's order that stops a Web site from routinely tossing relevant data could, if replicated, carry broad e-discovery implications.
Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian's May 29 order requires TorrentSpy to turn over customer data only ephemerally kept in its computers' random access memory, or RAM. It could result in floods of similar requests in other civil cases, according to Ira Rothken, the Novato, Calif.-based attorney for the TorrentSpy site.
The Los Angeles magistrate's order also has privacy watchdogs concerned.
Click here to read the entire article on Law.com.
Trackbacks (0)
Links to blogs that reference this article
Trackback URL
http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/admin/trackback/31957
http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/admin/trackback/31957
K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of more than 40 fully integrated offices located in North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations and registrations, visit www.klgates.com.
Portions of this Web site may contain Attorney Advertising under the rules of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
e-Discovery Analysis & Technology group at K&L Gates, offering services related to ediscovery, review of electronic documents, electronic discovery and electronic evidence discovery.
K&L Gates LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98104-1158
p. 206.623.7580, f. 206.623.7022
It's worth noting that the technical methodology used to accelerate the bits of movies is at issue in the case. "Bit torrent" technology is unique and likely a relevant issue given the claims. How the the defendant's model for torrents use RAM to move/manage data may well substantiate the specific claims here. The notion that data stored in RAM would be at issue generally isn't a conclusion that one should draw from this one ...