Electronic Discovery Law
Court Denies Motion Requiring Defendant to Allow Plaintiff onto Premises for Collection of Electronic Material
Bethea v. Comcast, 218 F.R.D. 328 (D.D.C. 2003)
Plaintiff in an employment discrimination suit moved for an order compelling defendants to allow her to enter upon their premises, inspect their computer systems and related programs, and copy any information relevant to her claims. Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the results of the discovery process and suspected that defendants possessed more information than they had produced.
The court denied the motion, finding that the plaintiff was merely speculating that additional documents existed and that defendants had unlawfully failed to produce them. "[A] party's suspicion that another party has failed to respond to document requests fully and completely does not justify compelled inspection of its computer systems." 218 F.R.D. at 330.
K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of more than 40 fully integrated offices located in North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations and registrations, visit www.klgates.com.
Portions of this Web site may contain Attorney Advertising under the rules of some states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
e-Discovery Analysis & Technology group at K&L Gates, offering services related to ediscovery, review of electronic documents, electronic discovery and electronic evidence discovery.
K&L Gates LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900, Seattle, Washington 98104-1158
p. 206.623.7580, f. 206.623.7022